Se afișează postările cu eticheta digital divide. Afișați toate postările
Se afișează postările cu eticheta digital divide. Afișați toate postările

25 octombrie 2010

CEPIS President Speech at the ECDL Forum 2010

Dear colleagues,
It is my pleasure to address you this morning, and with a certain pride, that I, as CEPIS President, come to these annual ECDL Foundation Forums. Such a large and international gathering is a striking demonstration of the reach of ECDL and ICDL.   
CEPIS, as most of you in Europe know, represents the national informatics societies, who with the help of European Union funding, created ECDL as a means to raise digital literacy levels in Europe. This was back in 1995.
Now, almost 15 years later, ECDL and ICDL have grown exponentially in their success and with the support of ECDL Foundation much has been achieved, not just in Europe but around the world.  At a time of economic upheaval, the role of ICT in empowering people is more crucial than ever before as its potential can provide greater benefits when these benefits are most needed.  However, with budget cuts and instability around the world, the risk of exclusion, the risk of skills falling down the list of priorities, and the risk of training and certification being perceived as removable budget lines in industry and government alike, are also great.
Nonetheless, I believe that ECDL Licensees also have a great opportunity at this time.  The European Commission’s Digital Agenda for Europe, which you heard about yesterday from Damien, represents Europe’s plan for the next decade.  It replaces i2010, the previous policy framework that encompassed the benefits of ICT for social and economic life.  The Digital Agenda for Europe is the strategy that the European Commission and Member State governments will adhere to for the next decade. It is based on seven action areas: the most important of which is for us the one called ‘enhancing digital literacy; skills and inclusion’.
Through this action line in the digital agenda there are two key chances that represent for ECDL an un-missable occasion to position ourselves as the champions of this agenda.
It is important to know that the Digital Agenda gives us the chance to take action, and to make impact in ensure that this agenda is a success. It clearly defines two areas of action, that for us represent the two main and most important opportunities. I will tell you now what I believe these opportunities to be and how you can and should pursue them.
The first of these two key opportunities relates to the development of a long term digital literacy policy. This is a framework within which you can advocate to your national governments for such a policy to  involve ECDL, or indeed be based upon ECDL. You are the experts on digital literacy and skills in your national environments, offering your expertise to your government in the development of this plan would be a valuable asset.  This is the first opportunity that I think about.
The second key opportunity relates to funding.  The digital agenda provides a channel through which you can help your governments to choose digital literacy and certification as priorities for future funding.  This can take place through the European Social Fund for the next programme cycle.  Sustainable funding is often a challenge in our business.  The digital agenda provides us with a means of overcoming this challenge.  This is the second opportunity that you have.
We make ask us rhetorically why e-Skills became a challenge for the modern society. We all know that new skills are needed, from ICT practitioner skills to ICT user or eBusiness skills. In 60 years since 1950 I made some calculations that the world population has increased 2.6 times, the number of ICT practitioners       4,000 times and of ICT users 400,000 times!
In fact, the result is that the demand for ICT User Skills doubles every 2 ½ years as the intervals between successive radical breakthroughs in computer science decrease exponentially. We have to be prepared for this challenge!
Applications appear at a much reduced accelerated speed compared to technology advances and even more implementation is delayed by need of skills. That is a solid base for promoting eInclusion and fighting digital divide.
Digital Competences are therefore in great demand. ICT User Skills Gap is directly related to eInclusion objectives. Europe faces Shortages and more all types of ICT skills are demanded. The gap is estimated by EC at 700,000 by 2015.
The fact is that in 2010 we are still facing the first Digital Divide and a 2nd Digital Divide is developing directly related to broadband divide and other factors as well.
ECDL is an outstanding example of best practice and we have to make the next steps from Digital Literacy to Digital Competence!
Going back to Europe’s Digital Agenda, it can serve to help position ECDL and indeed to an extent ICDL, as the leading certification standard for the next decade. 
It is has an important potential for us, it can provide a sustainable source of funding for national programmes. Through this agenda, you can, embed ECDL into your governments’ national plans. You can position your organisation as the authority for digital literacy in your country.  These are real opportunities that are available to you.  The potential benefits must be seized and can only be seized through strategic, consistent, deliverable plans of action toward these goals in both advocacy and PR. These are important opportunities, the like of which we have not seen in the past and are unlikely to see again in the future.  At least not for another decade.
I compliment ECDL Foundation, Jim and Damien on the open letter to President of the European Commission, Jose Manuel Barroso and to other high-profile political actors.  ECDL Foundation has committed to ambitious yet achievable targets, and it is only through you, the Licensee network,  that these targets can be reached.  Publicly declaring these targets this will benefit the profile of ECDL; but replication through a public relations campaign serves to show your national commitment to making the digital agenda a success and will have a similarly positive impact for your organisation.  I encourage you therefore to follow suit with high profile pledges to your national-level media, government and other actors. And I encourage you then to deliver on the targets that you state – in particular through the two actions I have already mentioned – by working with governments to develop their digital literacy policy and by ensuring that digital literacy is a national priority for European Social funds in your country.
Where the potential gain of the digital agenda is great, as is the risk. The risk in this case, might lie in our inertia, in our lack of response to the opportunities that we have right now. We must ensure therefore that we mitigate against this risk.  The opportunities are there, now more than ever, but action is needed from each and every one of you.  On behalf of CEPIS - the organisation that has been at the very inception of ECDL - I urge you, to take firm grasp of these opportunities and to ensure that ECDL and ICDL are firmly aligned in public support of this agenda and play visible role in the digital recovery of the global economy.
In conclusion, I reaffirm our belief that eSkills are a Challenge of the Beginning of the 21st Century. They are needed for Building a Competitive and eInclusive Europe and World! And again I would like to urge each and every one of you to take advantage of the opportunities that the Digital Agenda provide.
For further contact please visit www.cepis.org
Thank you!

Dr. Vasile Baltac
22 October 2010


13 aprilie 2010

eRomania

Sunt uimit de reacțiile stârnite de proiectul eRomania. Presa speculează că va fi folosit pentru spionarea cetăţenilor, că se cheltuie bani prea mulți,unii profesioniști cârtesc pe diverse liste sau bloguri, de asemenea, că sunt bani prea mulţi alocaţi.
Pe acest blog mi-am exprimat nu demult părerea că suntem în fundul unei prăpastii digitale așa de mari ca ţară europeană (vezi mai jos postarea despre Digital Divide) încât mi se pare că 500 milioane de euro, şi aceştia incerţi, sunt prea puţini bani alocaţi pentru recuperarea decalajului faţă de media europeană. Am autoturism şi vreau autostrăzi, dar să nu uităm că o Românie digitală cu adevărat ne va scuti de multe călătorii fizice prin tranzacții virtualizate.
Estimez că România trebuie să investească nu 500 milioane, ci multe miliarde de euro pentru a ajunge ca românul obișnuit să facă mai mult decât să caute pe web știri, să trimită mailuri și acelea fără subiect sau să descarce muzică și filme, dacă se poate fără bani.
Mi se pare corect să discutăm abordarea eRomania, dar sub aspectul priorităților și a eficienței dezvoltării și implementării aplicațiilor eGovernment.  Şi să nu uităm instruirea. Putem dezvolta aplicații minunate care chiar să şi meargă, dar dacă oamenii nu vor știi să le folosească vor fi bani risipiți. Ne paște decalajul digital din a doua generație, dar de spre aceasta am scris deja în articolul Education and the Second Generation Digital Divide



8 martie 2010

Digital Divide: "Prăpastie digitală" sau "decalaj digital" ?

Constat că sintagma "digital divide" este adesea tradusă la noi ca "decalajul digital", un eufemism pentru "prăpastia digitală". Ne este probabil jenă şi nu este politically correct să vorbim de prăpastie digitală după 20 ani de numeroase strategii şi planuri de tip România digitală sau eRomania.

În 1989 eram mult rămaşi în urmă faţă de Europa de vest, dar ocupam o poziţie invidiată în Europa de est, unde exportam cu succes minicalculatoare performante Independent sau Coral, cu software-ul şi aplicaţiile aferente.

După 20 ani, mă uit cu amărăciune pe raportul "Europe's Digital Competitiveness Report: Main achievements of the i2010 strategy 2005-2009" şi văd că România este pe locul 27 (desigur din 27) la accesul regulat la Internet, trimiterea de e-mailuri, căutarea de produse şi servicii on-line, căutarea de locuri de muncă prin internet, folosirea de servicii eGovernment de către firme şi cetăţeni ş.a.

Mai grav este că nu se vede nici luminiţa de la capătul tunelului: suntem pe ultimul loc în Uniunea Europeană şi la procentul din PIB al cheltuielilor C+D pentru tehnologiile informaţiei şi comunicaţiilor şi la procentul din totalul angajaţilor al personalului cu competenţe digitale de bază.

De regulă, citind astfel de rapoarte ne consolăm că am intrat târziu în UE, că noi şi Bulgaria suntem abonaţi la ultimele 2 locuri, etc.

Mai simplu ar fi să se adopte câteva măsuri energice de stimulare a unor proiecte naţionale de informatizare şi instruire pe scară largă a populaţiei în folosirea noilor tehnologii  (alfabetizare digitală).

Mi se pare absurd să nu găsim fonduri pentru eGovernment în 2010, fonduri echivalente probabil cu câţiva kilometrii de autostradă.

Prăpastia se adânceşte ... Nimeni nu stă pe loc.





30 iunie 2009

Despre Internet, ultraviolete, hoax, digital divide

Am primit în ultimele zile pe mail de la persoane foarte serioase mai multe avertizari privind radiaţii ultraviolete anormale pe care două puteri ale statului, guvernul şi mass-media, ni le ascund. La rândul lor persoanele respective le-au primit de la alte persoane serioase.

În principiu, este vorba de faptul că ni se ascunde o alertă generală în Europa privind radiaţiile ultraviolete provenite de la soare care au ajuns la nivele de 9,4 (Ungaria) de 9 ori mai mari decât poate suporta pielea omului în condiţii normale. În plus, că România este şi ea în zona afectată.

M-am documentat, operaţie foarte simplă, chiar pe Internet. Nu întâmplător informaţii detaliate sunt date de Guvernul Australiei, dată fiind radiaţia solară intensă asupra continentului respectiv.

La adresa
http://www.bom.gov.au/info/about_uv.shtml
ni se lămureşte ce este indexul UV, fiecare unitate a scalei reprezentând 25 miliwatt pe metru pătrat. O imagine sugestivă arată cum se citeşte o alertă de radiaţii ultraviolete.



Valori de 12 unităţi sunt considerate extreme şi periculoase, o expunere îndelungată conducând la pericolul cancerului de piele.

Am fost curios care sunt valorile înregistrate în ultimele zile la Bucureşti. Tot pe Internet am gasit monitorizarea indexului UV de către un laborator din Olanda
http://www.temis.nl/uvradiation/nrt/uvindex.php?lon=26.1&lat=44.4.
Am introdus coordonatele oraşului Bucuresti şi a rezultat tabelul de mai jos cu date care par normale pentru lunile de vară. Pentru comparaţie am studiat şi oraşul Bordeaux care se află aproximativ pe aceiaşi latitudine şi unde situaţia este comparabilă.
Bucharest
Date
UV
index
ozone
column
28 Jun 2009 7.6 343.2 DU
29 Jun 2009 7.9 332.8 DU
30 Jun 2009 7.8 334.6 DU
1 Jul 2009 7.6 340.8 DU
2 Jul 2009 7.6 341.1 DU
3 Jul 2009 8.1 324.0 DU
4 Jul 2009 8.1 325.3 DU
5 Jul 2009 8.2 322.4 DU
6 Jul 2009 8.1 324.0 DU

Bordeaux


Date
UV
index
ozone
column
28 Jun 2009 8.1 323.9 DU
29 Jun 2009 8.0 325.8 DU
30 Jun 2009 8.4 314.0 DU
1 Jul 2009 8.8 305.4 DU
2 Jul 2009 8.1 321.5 DU
3 Jul 2009 8.7 307.5 DU
4 Jul 2009 8.4 313.2 DU
5 Jul 2009 7.8 330.8 DU
6 Jul 2009 8.1 319.9 DU

În emisfera sudică fiind iarnă nivelele sunt reduse. Ca de exemplu, la Melbourne.

Melbourne


Date
UV
index
ozone
column
30 Jun 2009 1.6 313.0 DU
1 Jul 2009 1.6 301.7 DU
2 Jul 2009 1.4 354.3 DU
3 Jul 2009 1.7 293.8 DU
4 Jul 2009 1.8 280.2 DU
5 Jul 2009 1.9 274.8 DU
6 Jul 2009 1.8 282.7 DU
7 Jul 2009 1.7 305.6 DU
8 Jul 2009 1.7 302.6 DU

În concluzie, ştim cu toţii că vara radiaţiile ultraviolete sunt mai puternice decât în alte anotimpuri, medicii ne sfătuiesc să ne expunem moderat la soare, mai ales în iulie şi august. Dar, de aici până a anunţa că ni se ascunde o alertă generală este cale lungă.

Apare deci evident că mesajele sunt expresia unei glume proaste, în limba engleză hoax. Mă întreb adesea cine creează astfel de hoax-uri şi de ce o fac. Probabil, unii ca să se amuze pe seama celor ce nu au timp sau cunoştinţe să verifice. Alţii, chiar cred în ce spun, dar nu realizează că Era Digitală pemite multiplicarea exponenţială şi a ştirilor adevărate şi a celor false.

Internetul introduce o nouă formă de decalaj digital (digital divide), cel legat de capabilitatea de interpretare a conţinutului digital.


View Vasile Baltac's profile on LinkedIn

Ce este un browser?

Îi întreb adesea pe studenţii din primul an dacă ştiu şi pot explica şi altora ce este un browser. Un sondaj redat în filmuleţul postat pe YouTube arată că numai 8% din cei întrebaţi în Times Square, New York ştiau.

Oare care ar fi procentul la noi? Vorbitorii de limba engleză pot urmări acest film.












View Vasile Baltac's profile on LinkedIn

3 noiembrie 2007

eGovernment and Digital Divide

One of my first papers on eGovernment was published in the year 2000 and was called “eGovernment between fashion and necessity”.
Many ideas are still valid:
• eGovernment programs are launched with much publicity and public attention
• There is a relation between the success of a eGovernment program and Digital Divide status of the country
• An expensive eGovernment program in a country with poor Internet & ICT infrastructure may bring a waste of valuable resources
• Mentalities and lack of ICT training could a serious barrier
The conclusion was then, however, optimistic: do not delay eGovernment programs; they contribute to the spread of ICT and Internet, including to the change o mentalities.
The practice of 2 Romanian eGovernment initiatives proved later that I was right.
• The payment of local taxes over Internet was a good eGovernment application, but rarely used as most taxpayers had no Internet access and bank cards at that time.
• eProcurement made compulsory for several public acquisitions contributed a lot to the spread of Internet use in small and medium enterprises.
In fact, eGovernment programs have to take into account not only the needs and interests of the public administration. The priorities have to be set according to the acceptance potential of the country.
In my intervention at the previous GPPC2005, I set what I consider to be the 4 pillars of bridging Digital Divide:
• Appropriate ICT Infrastructure
• Accessible and Affordable Internet Access
• Generalized Ability to Use ICT
• Availability of Useful Content
Any country’s position regarding the first 3 pillars is of paramount importance in setting eGovernment for success. The 4th pillar is just consolidated by eGovernment programs adding useful content to country’s knowledge base.
The relationship between the success of implementation of eGovernment programs and the Digital Divide status of the country brings us to the conclusion that the imitation of eGovernment programs of ICT developed countries is useless and brings waste of resources.
The first 2 pillars are already a preoccupation for most countries, and unfortunately the metrics of Digital Divide is limited to these 2 aspects: appropriate ICT infrastructure and accessible and affordable Internet Access.
But in my opinion, eGovernment programs in most countries, except a few situated in the front line of ICT use, have to accompanied by extensive programs of education of citizens in the use of ICT, what is called in Europe eInclusion. Without generalized ability to use ICT, the information society and its part eGovernment will not be for all, but only for elite.
A program for the certification of these abilities was launched in Europe by CEPIS and is now spreading on many continents. ECDL/ICDL certifies that a person has the minimal abilities to use present ICT applications and the certificate is issued with uniform tests to insure the international recognition of the certificate. The first targets are public administration, university graduates and high-school graduates.
The spread of such training programs in the public administration units is a necessary condition for the success of eGovernment applications. These people are required to develop and operate them.
On the other hand, ICT education can help the access to eGovernment applications of several categories of citizens like people in rural areas, old people, people with disabilities, etc.
And finally a last but not least criteria to be added on check-list of priorities for launching eGovernment programs.
eGovernment may have a contribution to the improvement of our environment.
• Trees are cut to produce paper and paper is extensible used in not-eGovernment applications. Extending eGovernment less trees will be cut and our life will be better.
• Traffic became unbearable in many cities of the world. If the citizen will interact with local and central administration by Internet and not by car or bus or train, our air will be cleaner and again the life better. So, let us “Crowd the net and free the roads”.
To conclude let us come back to the first remark; eGovernment is a fashion or a necessity? Definitely, it a necessity but its implementation should be done taking into account local ICT readiness conditions and accompanied by complementary education programs of both public servants and citizens.

Prepared for WITSA GPPC 2007 Cairo eGovernment Panel 6 November 2007



25 martie 2007

Despre alfabet şi alfabetizarea ...digitală

Am reflectat de multe ori asupra a ceea ce înseamnă alfabetul pentru om. In cele ce urmează voi privi alfabetul privit în trei ipostaze.

Mai întâi alfabetul clasic. Alfabetul a fost primul mare pas înspre comunicarea între mai mult de doi oameni. Şi a mai fost în acest fel un pas uriaş spre transmiterea informaţiei şi cunoştinţelorcătre cei din jur. Un pas spre difuzia luminii cunoaşterii. Diversitatea este opera divinităţii şi alfabetul nu-i scapă. Lumea de ieri şi de azi cunoaşte multe expresii ale noţiunii de alfabet. Unele mai simpliste cum este tipul de alfabet bazat pe reprezentarea sunetelor pe care îl folosim popoarele indo-europene şi cel mai sofisticat chinezesc, bazat pe reprezentarea de idei, infinit mai puternic ca instrument de comunicare.

Alfabetul exprimă identitatea unui popor sau grup de popoare, trecutul şi prezentul lui. Nu rareori alfabetul a fost şi este folosit ca armă politică. Exemple nu este necesar să le căutăm prea departe. Ne putem gândi oare la ţara noastră aşa cum este acum, fără nobila acţiune a unor fraţi care au determinatîn secolul XIX trecerea la alfabetul latin? Sau putem uita noul început al Moldovei de peste Prut fără adoptarea politică a grafiei latine, puternic contestată şi azi de forţe panslave din Basarabia? Sau schisma în fond religioasă dintre slavii fostei Iugoslavii amplificată de folosirea de scrieri diferite.

Odată cu alfabetul a apărut şi alfabetizarea, adică stăpânirea bazelor comunicării scrise. Şi tot odată cu primul

Decembrie 2006